Jackson v. Beasley
| Jaramus Sharrod Jackson |
| Jacob Beasley |
| 1:2024cv00384 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| J Elizabeth McBath |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Hobbs Hill on behalf of Jacob Beasley (Hill, Meghan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Brock on behalf of Jacob Beasley (Brock, Elizabeth) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Certified Mailing as to Jacob Beasley and Attorney General re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #3 Order on Motion for Discovery. Certified Mail Number 91 7199 9991 7032 5718 7769 and 91 7199 9991 7032 5718 7776 . (dgr) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jaramus Sharrod Jackson re #3 Order on Motion for Discovery. (dgr) |
Filing 3
ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of the petition and this Order by certified mail to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Georgia. Respondent is ORDERED to (1) show cause within 60 DAYS of the receipt of this Order why the petition should not be granted, and (2) transmit to this Court all available pleadings, transcripts, and decisions needed to determine the issues raised. Petitioner also submitted a motion for limited discovery #2 . Accordingly, Petitioners motion for limited discovery #2 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court notes that Petitioners requested discovery may be provided or otherwise addressed when Respondent files his response to the petition. If the Court determines that discovery is necessary after reviewing the response, the Court will reconsider, sua sponte, Petitioners request for discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 2/7/2024. (dgr)
|
| Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #2 MOTION for Limited Discovery for frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (tht) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Limited Discovery by Jaramus Sharrod Jackson. (tht) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jaramus Sharrod Jackson. ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 100009191.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Beasley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jaramus Sharrod Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Jacob Beasley | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Brock |
| Represented By: | Meghan Hobbs Hill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
