Boyd v. Hancock State Prison et al
Plaintiff: Davious Marques Boyd
Defendant: Hancock State Prison and Officer Reinfroe
Case Number: 1:2024cv00444
Filed: January 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Amy Totenberg
Referring Judge: Linda T Walker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING the #3 Final Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the court. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District Georgia. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 2/20/2024. (jpa)
February 20, 2024 Case electronically transferred to District of Middle District of Georgia. (jpa)
February 20, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Davious Marques Boyd re #5 Order (jpa)
February 20, 2024 Civil Case Terminated. (jpa)
February 20, 2024 New Civil Action Number in USDC MDGA 5:24-cv-0062 (aar)
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/2/24. (jpa)
February 2, 2024 Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. It is RECOMMENDED that this case be TRANSFERRED to the Macon Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 2/2/24. (jpa)
February 2, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Davious Marques Boyd re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (jpa)
January 31, 2024 Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (tht)
January 30, 2024 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Davious Marques Boyd. (tht)
January 30, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Davious Marques Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Hancock State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davious Marques Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hancock State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Reinfroe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?