Carter v. DeKalb County Sheriff's Office
| James E. Carter |
| DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Dekalb County District Attorney, Dekalb County Sheriff and Dekalb Police Chief |
| 1:2024cv00535 |
| February 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Dekalb County District Attorney, Dekalb County Sheriff, Dekalb Police Chief filed by James E. Carter.(kng) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/26/2021. (kng)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James E. Carter re #8 Order. (kng) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by James E. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(klb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - without regard to the merits of this case, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without prepayment of filing fees or docket costs. It is further ORDERED that service of process shall not issue at this time. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this case to the District Court for a frivolity determination pursuant to 28. U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 2/22/24. c:Financial Office(klb)
|
| Submission of #7 Complaint, for a frivolity determination, to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (klb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James E. Carter re #6 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (klb) |
| Submission of #5 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (kng) |
| Filing 5 Amended APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James E. Carter. (kng) |
| Filing 4 Second NOTICE Of Filing Updated Phone Number by James E. Carter (kng) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Of Filing Updated Phone Number by James E. Carter (kng) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - the Court ORDERS plaintiff to submit a completed form application to proceed IFP and affidavit of indigence, or submit the full filing fee on or before February 21, 2024. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail plaintiff the appropriate financial affidavit and application, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED TO RESUBMIT this action to the assigned Magistrate Judge upon receipt of the filing fee or affidavit, or on the above deadline. (Forms sent to party: Affidavit to Proceed IFP; ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 2/7/24. (klb)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James E. Carter re #2 Order and Forms Sent. (klb) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (kng) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James E. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for a Civil Case, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kng) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
