Bakare Hampton et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Oluwakemi V. Bakare Hampton, Daniel Iya Hampton and Ortavius O. Hampton |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Micah R. Brown |
| 1:2024cv00704 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Micah R. Brown. (tht) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (tht) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (tht) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons as to Merrick B. Garland)(tht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Oluwakemi V. Bakare Hampton, Daniel Iya Hampton, and Ortavius O. Hampton (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13230640) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
