Tran v. Jaddou et al
Thong Duc Tran |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Catherine McGeary |
1:2024cv00820 |
February 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Thong Duc Tran. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 3/18/2023, answer due 5/17/2023. (Alwan, Zainab) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 2/23/2024. (bnp) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Catherine McGeary. (jkb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (jkb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Thong Duc Tran. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13244360) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs I-485 Receipt Notice, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs I-824 Receipt Notice, #3 Exhibit Historical Case Processing Times, #4 Exhibit USCIS.gov Case Processing Times for Form I-824, #5 Exhibit Plaintiffs permanent resident card, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.