Mathis v. Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison
| Billie Joe Ken Mathis |
| Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison |
| 1:2024cv00927 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Billie Joe Ken Mathis re #4 Order and #5 Clerk's Judgment. (tht) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. It is Ordered and Adjudged that the action be DISMISSED without prejudice. (tht)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. #2 , as its opinion: The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a plausible claim for relief and because it appears that the action was not filed in the proper district. The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 04/11/2024. (tht)
|
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (tht) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 03/21/2024. (tht)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned RECOMMEND that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and CLOSED rather than transferred. The undersigned DIRECT the Clerk to terminate the referral of this civil action to me. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 03/21/2024. (tht) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Billie Joe Ken Mathis re #2 Final R&R and #3 Order for Service. (tht) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and Frivolity review to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Billie Joe Ken Mathis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mathis v. Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Billie Joe Ken Mathis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
