Che et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Siofong Che and Lyndsy Yim |
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company |
1:2024cv01037 |
March 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/11/2024. (bnp) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Allied Group, Inc for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (pdt) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13277959) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Gwinnett Superior Court Filings, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Caroline M. Gieser, #3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/11/2024: #5 Corrected Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Caroline M. Gieser) (ane). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.