VPR Brands, LP v. Shenzhen Fango Technology Co., LTD. et al
VPR Brands, LP |
Shenzhen Fango Technology Co., LTD. doing business as Elfworld and Andy's Wholesale Inc. |
1:2024cv01154 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (tht) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED AO 120 . (Rothman, Joel) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/19/2024. (bnp) |
Notice of deficiency re AO Form 120. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 120. See LR 3.4 and LPR 1.4. Docket the form using the event AO 120, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (tht) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Andy's Wholesale Inc. (tht) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Shenzhen Fango Technology Co., LTD. (tht) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by VPR Brands, LP. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13296834) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ELF Registration (616 Mark), #2 Exhibit 2 - ELF Specimen, #3 Exhibit 3 - 622 Patent, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.