Freeman v. The Great American Dream, Inc. et al
| Mary Freeman |
| The Great American Dream, Inc. doing business as Pin Ups, SlickVic's LLC doing business as Slick Vic Entertainment, Ashley Fowler and Victor Davidson |
| 1:2024cv01198 |
| March 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons by Mary Freeman. (Moeller, Beth) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Mary Freeman to Victor Davidson (Moeller, Beth) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Mary Freeman to SlickVic's LLC d/b/a Slick Vic Entertainment (Moeller, Beth) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Mary Freeman to The Great American Dream, Inc. (Moeller, Beth) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Mary Freeman to Ashley Fowler (Moeller, Beth) |
| Filing 1 COLLECTIVE ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Mary Freeman. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13300847) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Freeman Consent to Join, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbu) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
