Pace v. Oliver et al
| Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace |
| Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons |
| 1:2024cv01557 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Christopher Carr, Shawn Emmons, Tyrone Oliver. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(rsg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/15/2024: #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (rsg). |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 4/15/2024. (rsg)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (gww) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Unexecuted Summons for Christopher Carr, #5 Unexecuted Summons for Tyrone Oliver, #6 Unexecuted Summons for Shawn Emmons, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(gww) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
