Savaliya et al v. Jaddou et al
| Kaushal Savaliya and Dhwani Diamonds Inc. |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Tracy Tarango |
| 1:2024cv01817 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Vano Haroutunian. Clerk to follow-up by 5/9/2024. (djs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Tarango, and U.S. Attorney (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(gww) Modified on 4/29/2024 (gww). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13391907) filed by Kaushal Savaliya, Dhwani Diamonds Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit Approval Notice, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Decision, #3 Exhibit Exhibit Receipt Notice, #4 Exhibit Exhibit Request for Evidence, #5 Exhibit Exhibit Response to Request for Evidence, #6 Exhibit Consent of Designated Counsel, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(gww) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
