Ballo v. Addison et al
| Bocary Ballo |
| Jerry Addison, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland |
| 1:2024cv01875 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 4/30/2024. (bnp)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jerry Addison, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (gww) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13399155) filed by Bocary Ballo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - USCIS Approval Notice I-485, #2 Exhibit B - USCIS notice of USPS non-delivery, #3 Exhibit C - USPS Tracking History, #4 Exhibit D - I-485 Application address, #5 Exhibit E - Press Release Senator Ossoff, #6 Exhibit I-90 Application, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(gww) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
