Erickson v. Barmettler et al
| Matthew Erickson |
| Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe |
| 1:2024cv02115 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J P Boulee |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on May 30, 2024. (jkl)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER declining assignment of this case. The case is reassigned to Judge J. P. Boulee for all further proceedings. Judge Amy Totenberg no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:24-cv-2115-JPB. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 5/29/24. (jpa)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Jesse Barmettler. (gww) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13436307) filed by Matthew Erickson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(gww) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
