Grant et al v. Bridge Homes - Atlanta
Caroline Danette Grant and Ckelsey Deshaun Grant |
Bridge Homes - Atlanta |
1:2024cv02140 |
May 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Caroline Danette Grant, Ckelsey Deshaun Grant. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this file to the assigned District Judge for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 5/16/2024. (dmb) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Caroline Danette Grant, Ckelsey Deshaun Grant. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmr) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Caroline Danette Grant, and Ckelsey Deshaun Grant re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,. (dmb) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (bmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.