Jackson v. Ward et al
| William R. Jackson |
| WARDEN Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels |
| 1:2024cv02193 |
| May 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Atlanta Office |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Southern; Case Number 3:24-cv-00033. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 4
ORDER transferring this action to the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division for further consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 5/20/24. (loh) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 5/20/2024.]
|
| Submission of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (aar) |
| Filing 3 Inmate Account Statement by William R. Jackson. (loh) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 5/20/2024.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by William R. Jackson. REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(loh) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 5/20/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William R. Jackson.(loh) [Transferred from Georgia Southern on 5/20/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
