Catalan Carias v. Garland et al
Eladio Catalan Carias |
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jonathan Meyer, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services and Vermont Service Center |
1:2024cv02213 |
May 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Thomas W Thrash |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Jonathan Meyer. (jkb) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Eladio Catalan Carias (Claffey, Danielle) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Vermont Service Center, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons Merrick B. Garland, #2 Summons Ur Mendoza Jaddou, #3 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas, #4 Summons Vermont Service Center)(bmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Eladio Catalan Carias. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13448637) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(bmr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.