Flowers v. Laughlin
Nicambreon Flowers |
Vance Laughlin |
1:2024cv03755 |
August 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Justin S Anand |
Steven D Grimberg |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER. Petitioner is ORDERED to submit the $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 10/17/2024. (bgt) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Nicambreon Flowers re #7 Order. (bgt) |
Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING #3 Non-Final Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 9/17/2024. (tas) |
Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: Docket reviewed; no conflicts identified. Approved by Judge Grimberg. (dnb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Nicambreon Flowers re #6 Order on Report and Recommendation, Order ruling on IFP. (tas) |
ORDER DENYING In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 9/17/2024. (tas) |
Submission of #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nicambreon Flowers, to District Judge Steven D. Grimberg. (dnb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Nicambreon Flowers re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nicambreon Flowers. (tas) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 8/23/2024. (tas) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 8/23/2024. (tas) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, for IFP and Frivolity Determinationto Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (djs) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Nicambreon Flowers. (djs) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Nicambreon Flowers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(djs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flowers v. Laughlin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Vance Laughlin | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Nicambreon Flowers | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.