Bell v. Merit Service Protection Board et al
Plaintiff: Andrew W. Bell
Defendant: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, U.S. Department of Labor, Merit Service Protection Board and U.S. Department of Transportation
Case Number: 1:2024cv04098
Filed: September 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Geraghty
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2024 Submission of #13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (ane)
October 1, 2024 Submission of #7 Motion for Leave for Additional Time to Correct and Resubmit Pleadings, #9 MOTION for Leave to Combine Cases, #10 MOTION for Leave to Combine Cases, and #11 MOTION for Leave for Additional Time to Correct and Resubmit Pleadings to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (sap)
September 26, 2024 Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Andrew W. Bell. (ces)
September 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 9/20/2024. (sap)
September 20, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Andrew W. Bell re #12 Order. (ane)
September 13, 2024 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave for Additional Time to Correct and Resubmit Pleadings by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Combine Cases by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Combine Cases by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE Of Filing Petition for Review of Merit Service Protection Board's Final Order by Andrew W. Bell (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave for Additional Time to Correct and Resubmit Pleadings by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave for Correcting the Date Petitioner's Petitions for Review of the Merit Service Protection Board were Filed with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave for Additional Time to Correct and Resubmit Pleadings by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Combine Cases by Andrew W. Bell. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Andrew W. Bell. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Review, #2 Petition for Review of Merit Service Protection Board's Final Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(bgt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
September 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this matter to the District Judge for a frivolity determination under 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 9/13/2024. (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Andrew W. Bell re #2 Order (bgt)
September 13, 2024 Submission of #3 Complaint for Frivolity Review and #4 , #5 , and #6 Motions to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (bgt)
September 12, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew W. Bell. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 petition for review, #3 Motion for leave to combine, #4 Motion for leave, #5 petition for review, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(djs) Modified on 9/13/2024 (djs). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2024: #7 Motion for Leave for Correcting the Date Petitioner's Petitions for Review of the Merit Service Protection Board were Filed with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court) (bgt).
September 12, 2024 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (djs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Merit Service Protection Board et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merit Service Protection Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew W. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?