Robinson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Takisha N. Robinson |
Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
1:2024cv04577 |
October 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Catherine M Salinas |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Takisha N. Robinson. (Comerford, Ida) |
CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: #5 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:24-CV-4577-CMS. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (ddm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Stevens on behalf of Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Stevens, Timothy) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Takisha N. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING #1 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/09/2024. (ddm) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Takisha N. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A- Notice of Decision-Unfavorable, #3 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(djs) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (djs) |
NOTICE of Service of Social Security Complaint. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing notifying the USA and the Regional SSA Office of General Counsel of the #3 Complaint. No summons shall issue. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 10/9/2024, answer due 1/17/2025. Counsel for USA must enter a notice of appearance prior to viewing documents in this civil action. (ddm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robinson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Takisha N. Robinson | |
Represented By: | Ida Comerford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Timothy Stevens |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.