Goodwin v. Gruma Corporation et al
| Dylan Nicole Goodwin |
| Gruma Corporation and Ulises Emmanuel Rodriguez Chavez |
| 1:2025cv00724 |
| February 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Sarah E Geraghty |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Ulises Emmanuel Rodriguez Chavez.(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Gruma Corporation. Discovery ends on 7/14/2025.(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Gruma Corporation and Ulises Emmanuel Rodriguez Chavez. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-14060882). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A State Court Filings with Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C- Notice to State Court of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
