Gazca v. Manifest Multimedia Incorporated et al
Virgil Gazca |
Manifest Multimedia Incorporated, Manifest Mutimedia LLC doing business as Manifest Music LLC and Gregory Leron Davenport, Jr |
1:2025cv01614 |
March 27, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Admission of Jeremy D. Ray Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-14179689).by Virgil Gazca. (Rothring, Stephen) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Virgil Gazca. (dgr) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Gregory Leron Davenport, Jr., Manifest Multimedia Incorporated, Manifest Mutimedia LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons Manifest, #2 Summons Davenport)(dgr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Virgil Gazca. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-14177180) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.