Foy v. Bridge Property Management
| Philip Foy |
| Bridge Property Management and Dunwoody Village Apartment Homes |
| 1:2025cv03421 |
| June 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the USM 285 form, summons, and the initial disclosures form. Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the USM 285 form, summons, and the initial disclosures form, and to return to the Clerk of Court one of each for each Defendant named in the complaint within 21 days from the entry date of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned if Plaintiff fails to comply. Upon receipt of the forms by the Clerk, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a service waiver package for each Defendant. Upon completion of the service waiver packages, the Clerk is DIRECTED to complete the lower portion of the Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver form and to mail a service waiver package to each Defendant. In the event that any Defendant does not return the Waiver of Service form to the Clerk of Court within 35 days following the date the service waiver package was mailed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshals Service a service package for that Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 12/3/2025. (ajw)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Philip Foy re #5 Order. Forms sent to party: USM 285; Summons; Initial Disclosures; (ajw) |
| Submission of #3 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bridge Property Management, Dunwoody Village Apartment Homeswith Jury Demand filed by Philip Foy.(ajw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The application to proceed IFP, Doc. #1 , is GRANTED, and Plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint by July 28, 2025. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the Court's pro se employment discrimination complaint form stamped with the case number for this matter. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to resubmit this matter to the undersigned on July 28, 2025 or upon the filing of the amended complaint, whichever is earlier. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 06/27/2025. (ajw)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Philip Foy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ajw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Philip Foy re #3 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Forms sent to party: pro se employment discrimination complaint form. (ajw) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Philip Foy. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
