Hamilton Hills I LLC v. Chew
Plaintiff: Hamilton Hills I LLC doing business as Hamilton Hills I
Defendant: Cheryl Chew
Case Number: 1:2026cv03021
Filed: June 1, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Regina D Cannon
Referring Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2026 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, for IFP and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. (fbj)
June 1, 2026 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cheryl Chew. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (fbj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamilton Hills I LLC v. Chew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hamilton Hills I LLC doing business as Hamilton Hills I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Chew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?