Mitchell et al v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
| Steven Mitchell, Dori Mitchell, Jerome Hopper and Lori Hopper |
| Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. |
| 1:2026cv03651 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Philip L. Vujanov. Clerk to follow-up by 7/13/2026. (dps) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Jason T. Albin. Clerk to follow-up by 7/13/2026. (dps) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to John S. Chapman. Clerk to follow-up by 7/13/2026. (dps) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.. (tcc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Steven Mitchell, Dori Mitchell, Lori Hopper, Jerome Hopper. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-15350328) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tcc) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
