Chandler v. Cronic et al
| Paige Chandler |
| Ron Dobbins, Amanda Norman, Steve Cronic and Jeffrey Hooper |
| 2:2008cv00154 |
| July 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Gainesville Office |
| Hall |
| OKelley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER denying Defendants' 32 Motion for Reconsideration of 31 Order. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 06/18/10. (sk)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER that Defendants Dobbins and Normans Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 15 is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs official capacity claims, the Section 1983 claim (Count I), and the intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims (Cou nts IV and V) asserted against Defendants Dobbins and Norman. The Motion is DENIED as to the state law claim of false imprisonment (Count II) asserted against Defendants Dobbins and Norman in their individual capacities. Defendant Hoopers Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 16 is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs official capacity claims. The Motion 16 is DENIED as to Plaintiffs Section 1983claim (Count I) and Plaintiffs state law claims (Counts II, III, IV, V) asserted against Defendant Hooper in his individual capacity. Defendant Cronics Motion to Dismiss 24 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 09/23/09. (sk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
