Woody v. Cronic et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Franklin Woody
Defendant: Seymore, Underwood, Steve Cronic, Lundis and Linwood Zoller
Case Number: 2:2009cv00173
Filed: October 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Hall
Presiding Judge: Story
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DENYING 24 Motion to Appeal in forma pauperis. Any further requests by Plaintiff to appeal in forma pauperis should be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 2/18/2010. (vld)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 3 Plaintiffs motion to add Hall County as a party. Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to file affidavit and authorization 13 is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2009. Plaintiffs motion for extension of time to file proper documents 14 is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to November 30, 2009. Plaintiffs motion to amend and motion for extension of time due to institutional lockdown 16 is GRANTED nunc pro tunc to December 21, 2009. The amended pro se civil rights action 1 an d 16 is DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the purpose of dismissal only, Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 and 15 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs motion forappointment of counsel 4 , motion for order 18 , and motion for summary judgment 19 are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to add Hall County as a Defendant and then to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 01/27/10. (sk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woody v. Cronic et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Seymore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Cronic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lundis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linwood Zoller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Franklin Woody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?