Henriquez v. El Pais Q'Hubocali.com et al
| Carlos H. Henriquez |
| El Pais Q'Hubocali.com, Rodrigo Lloreda Mena, Maria Lucia Lloreda Garces and Alfredo Dominguez Borrero |
| 2:2011cv00191 |
| July 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Gainesville Office |
| Hall |
| Richard W. Story |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING 9 Defendants Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The Court DENIES as moot all other motions, namely: Plaintiffs 10 Request for Entry of Default; Plaintiffs 15 Motion to Call a Conference Pursua nt to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)(1); Plaintiffs 19 Motion to Reaffirm or Declare, Invocate and Establish and Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Defendants Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2), 28 U.S.C. § 13 91(a)(2), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(1)(A), O.C.G.A. § 9-10-91(3) or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2); Plaintiffs 21 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2); Plaintif fs 24 Motion to Compel Disclosure Pursuant to LR 37.1 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(3)(A); Plaintiffs 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; and, finally, Defendants 32 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Ruling on Defendants [sic] Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 2/21/2012. (vld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
