Brown v. Great Northern Insurance Co. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Georgia Northern District Brown v. Great Northern Insurance Co. et al

Brown v. Great Northern Insurance Co. et al

Plaintiff:	William Bobby Brown
Defendant:	Great Northern Insurance Co.
Case Number:	2:2014cv00015
Filed:	January 15, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Office:	Gainesville Office
County:	Forsyth
Presiding Judge:	Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2015	Filing 67 ORDER: Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED as to all claims except for breach of contract. Plaintiffs Motion to Defer Ruling on Summary Judgment 18 , Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Summary J udgment 23 , and Plaintiffs Supplement to Cross Motion for Summary Judgment 40 are DENIED. Defendant and SunTrusts Motions to Quash [43, 47, 55] are GRANTED without prejudice. Therefore, Defendants Motion to Alter Order Granting Plaintiffs Request for Depositions 38 is DENIED as moot. In addition, the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove Louis Levensons Petition for Attorneys Lien 59 as a pending motion. Finally, consistent with the Courts September 12, 2014 Order 64 granting an extension of tim e for discovery after ruling on the above motions, the parties shall confer to agree on a proposed scheduling order. If the parties cannot agree, they shall advise the Court that a scheduling conference is necessary. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 03/02/15. (sk)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2015

Filing 67 ORDER: Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED as to all claims except for breach of contract. Plaintiffs Motion to Defer Ruling on Summary Judgment 18 , Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Summary J udgment 23 , and Plaintiffs Supplement to Cross Motion for Summary Judgment 40 are DENIED. Defendant and SunTrusts Motions to Quash [43, 47, 55] are GRANTED without prejudice. Therefore, Defendants Motion to Alter Order Granting Plaintiffs Request for Depositions 38 is DENIED as moot. In addition, the Clerk is DIRECTED to remove Louis Levensons Petition for Attorneys Lien 59 as a pending motion. Finally, consistent with the Courts September 12, 2014 Order 64 granting an extension of tim e for discovery after ruling on the above motions, the parties shall confer to agree on a proposed scheduling order. If the parties cannot agree, they shall advise the Court that a scheduling conference is necessary. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 03/02/15. (sk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Great Northern Insurance Co. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Bobby Brown
Represented By:	Louis Levenson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Great Northern Insurance Co.
Represented By:	Harold Michael Bagley
Represented By:	Brittany H. Bolton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?