Hardigree v. Lofton et al
| Anthony Wayne Hardigree |
| Marc Lofton, City of Statham, Garrett Smith and Barrow County Sheriff's Deputy Wood |
| 2:2017cv00236 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Barrow |
| Richard W. Story |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER: Plaintiffs 63 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count One (illegal entry) as to Officer Lofton but is otherwise DENIED. Defendant Officer Loftons 57 Motion for Summary Ju dgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is DENIED as to Count One (illegal entry), DENIED as to Count Two (false arrest), GRANTED as to Count Three (malicious prosecution), DENIED as to Count Four (excessive force), and DENIED as to Count Five (state law claims). Defendant Deputy Norriss 60 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is GRANTED as to Count One (illegal entry) and DENIED as to Count Four (excessive force). Defendant Trooper Smi ths 55 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant City of Stathams 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff, Defendant Officer Lofton, and Defendant Deputy Norris are ORDERED to file a proposed consolidated pretrial order within thirty days of this order. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 07/30/2019.(rsg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
