Cellairis Franchise, Inc. et al v. John Does 1-10

Plaintiff: Cellairis Franchise, Inc. and JJT Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2017cv00268
Filed: December 1, 2017
Court: Georgia Northern District Court
Office: Gainesville Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: Richard W. Story
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cellairis Franchise, Inc. et al v. John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cellairis Franchise, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher Prine Bussert
Represented By: James White Faris, VI
Represented By: John P. Jett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JJT Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Christopher Prine Bussert
Represented By: James White Faris, VI
Represented By: John P. Jett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?