Polke v. Hill et al
| Barbara Polke |
| Dr. Hill and Lee Arrendale Medical Staff |
| 2:2019cv00127 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J Clay Fuller |
| Richard W Story |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay the standard filing fee of $400.00 within 30 days or execute and return an Affidavit and Authorization allowing Custodian to withdraw funds from Inmate Account. Failure to submit payment may result in dismissal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to RESUBMIT this action to the undersigned upon Plaintiffs compliance with this Order or the expiration of the thirty-day time period. Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization; 42:1983 Forms; Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 07/15/2019. (rsg)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Barbara Polke re #2 Order, Forms Sent. (rsg) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller for IFP and Frivolity Review. (dgr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Barbara Polke.(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
