Randolph v. City of Baldwin Police Department et al
Joshua Brian Randolph |
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Chief of Police, City of Baldwin Police Department, John Doe #3, John Doe #2 and City of Baldwin Georgia |
2:2019cv00147 |
July 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
Steve C Jones |
Richard W Story |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (rjs)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 8 ORDER adopting #6 Final Report and Recommendation as the Opinion and Order of this Court. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 9/9/2019. (rjs) |
Submission of #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rjs) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Brian Randolph re #8 Order and #9 Clerk's Judgment. (rjs) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rjs) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Brian Randolph re #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #7 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rjs) |
ORDER DENYING In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 8/14/2019. (rjs) |
Filing 7 ORDER for Service of #6 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 8/14/2019. (rjs) |
Filing 6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint RECOMMENDING that the instant action be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 8/14/2019. (rjs) |
ORDER (found in the #6 R&R): The request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff's #3 motion to set aside the filing fee and his #4 motion to amend at a later time are DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 8/14/2019. (rjs) |
Submission of #4 MOTION to Amend and #3 MOTION To Set Aside Filing Fee to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (rjs) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Brian Randolph re #5 Order Reassigning Case. (dgr) |
Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Steve C. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Richard W. Story no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 2:19-cv-147-SCJ-JCF. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 7/22/2019. (dgr) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint at a Later Time by Joshua Brian Randolph. (dgr) |
Filing 3 MOTION To Set Aside Filing Fee by Joshua Brian Randolph. (dgr) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Joshua Brian Randolph. (dgr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joshua Brian Randolph.(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #1 Complaint and #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (dgr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.