Lloyd v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
| Nancy Lloyd |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 2:2019cv00149 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Richard W Story |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: #13 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 9/10/2019. (dgr)
|
| Filing 14 Initial Disclosures by Nancy Lloyd.(Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 13 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Nancy Lloyd. (Robinson, Douglas) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Application for Admission of Nathan Patrick Lusignan Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 08/28/2019. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(rsg)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Application for Admission of Ian Hugh Morrison Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 08/28/2019. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(rsg)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #9 APPLICATION for Admission of Ian Hugh Morrison Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8879808). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.. Attorney Ian H. Morrison added appearing on behalf of The Prudential Insurance Company of America (pmb) |
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #10 APPLICATION for Admission of Nathan Patrick Lusignan Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8879827). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.. Attorney Nathan P. Lusignan added appearing on behalf of The Prudential Insurance Company of America (pmb) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Admission of Nathan Patrick Lusignan Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8879827). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hart, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 APPLICATION for Admission of Ian Hugh Morrison Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-8879808). Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hart, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Hart, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Discovery ends on 1/6/2020.(Hart, Daniel) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Nancy Lloyd. The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 7/19/2019, answer due 8/9/2019. (Robinson, Douglas) |
|
Filing 5
COURT NOTICE of Filing: Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation by Judge Richard W. Story. (sk)
|
| Refund in the amount of $400.00 has been processed, effective 7/19/2019 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Nancy Lloyd. (Robinson, Douglas) |
| Clerks Approval re #3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec) |
| Filing 3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC-8797151. (Robinson, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (dgr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nancy Lloyd. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-8797278) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lloyd v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
| Represented By: | Nathan P. Lusignan |
| Represented By: | Ian H. Morrison |
| Represented By: | Daniel Paul Hart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nancy Lloyd | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Max Robinson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
