Murdock v. Dawson County, Georgia
| Marguerite Murdock |
| Dawson County, Georgia |
| 2:2020cv00141 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J Clay Fuller |
| Richard W Story |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Dawson County, Georgia. Discovery ends on 12/17/2020.(Frickey, Paul) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 8
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 7/10/2020 (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 7
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 07/01/2020. (adg) (ADI)
|
|
(Minute entry) ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Dawson County, Georgia Answer due 7/20/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 6/16/2020. (clk)
|
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed filed by Dawson County, Georgia. (Dance, Deborah) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER regarding the Motion for Extension to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint re: #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Dance, Deborah) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Dawson County, Georgia. (Dance, Deborah) |
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER 20-01 THIRD AMENDMENT IN RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 5/26/2020. (dgr)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Dawson County, Georgia. (dgr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Marguerite Murdock. (Filing fee $400, receipt number AGANDC-9773116) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murdock v. Dawson County, Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dawson County, Georgia | |
| Represented By: | Paul B. Frickey |
| Represented By: | Angela E. Davis |
| Represented By: | Deborah L. Dance |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marguerite Murdock | |
| Represented By: | Rudi Julius |
| Represented By: | Edward D. Buckley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
