Thomas v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
| Gregory Thomas |
| Wal-Mart, Inc. and John and Jane Does #1-10 |
| 2:2020cv00232 |
| October 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Richard W Story |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Beaton, Ernest) |
Filing 4
COURT NOTICE of Filing: Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation by Judge Richard W. Story. (sk)
|
|
Filing 3
GENERAL ORDER 20-01 EIGHTH AMENDMENT IN RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 9/28/2020. (dgr)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart, Inc. Discovery ends on 3/4/2021.(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Wal-Mart, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AGANDC-10225011) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Emails, #2 Exhibit B- State Court Filings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(dgr) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
