Joseph v. Murray et al
Plaintiff: Tabetha L. Joseph
Defendant: Evans Trucking Company, LLC, Steve W. Murray and Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2020cv00289
Filed: December 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Richard W Story
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (dgs) (ADI)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER approving the #4 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 01/11/2021. (rsg)
January 11, 2021 Filing 4 First JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company. (James, Stuart)
December 15, 2020 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Evans Trucking Company, LLC, Steve W. Murray. Discovery ends on 5/14/2021.(James, Stuart) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020. (rsg)
December 10, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT. filed by Steve W. Murray, Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Evans Trucking Company, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-10477193) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Pleadings from Superior Court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joseph v. Murray et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tabetha L. Joseph
Represented By: William Donald Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Evans Trucking Company, LLC
Represented By: Stuart F. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve W. Murray
Represented By: Stuart F. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Stuart F. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?