Martin v. Hise et al
Thelma Ivy Martin |
Tricia Hise, Amy Thomas, Allen Jones and Rachel Newsome |
2:2023cv00089 |
May 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
Richard W Story |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tricia Hise, Allen Jones, Rachel Newsome filed by Thelma Ivy Martin.(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #8 Amended Complaint, frivolity review, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rsg) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action. (rsg)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 6 Order to Dismiss without Prejudice Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) and DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Order. If the Plaintiff files such an amended complaint in the time allowed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reopen the case and resubmit the matter to the Court for a frivolity review. The Court warns Plaintiff that a failure to correct the deficiencies identified in this Order may result in a dismissal of the claims with prejudice. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 06/14/2023. (rsg) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Thelma Ivy Martin re #6 Order to Dismiss,, #7 Clerk's Judgment. (rsg) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Thelma Ivy Martin. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Thelma Ivy Martin re #4 Order. (ddm) |
Submission of #3 Complaint, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (ddm) |
Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Steve C. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Richard W. Story no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 2:23-CV-89-SCJ. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 05/17/2023. (ddm) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Thelma Ivy Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to submit this action to the District Judge for review of Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 05/17/2023. (rsg) |
Submission of #3 Complaint, to District Judge Richard W. Story. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Thelma Ivy Martin re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (rsg) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thelma Ivy Martin. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of IFP Motion, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (ddm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.