Phillip v. Caterpillar Inc.
| Kurt Phillip |
| Caterpillar Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00265 |
| December 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J Clay Fuller |
| Steve C Jones |
| Richard W Story |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Victoria Williamson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13101889). Attorney Victoria Williamson added appearing on behalf of Kurt Phillip. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (rvb) |
DOCKET ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Victoria Williamson. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 12/18/2023. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(pdw)
|
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Victoria Williamson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13101889).by Kurt Phillip. (Billips, Matthew) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons by Kurt Phillip. (Billips, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kurt Phillip. Caterpillar Inc. waiver mailed on 12/13/2023, answer due 2/12/2024. (Billips, Matthew) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Steve C. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Richard W. Story no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 2:23-cv-00265-SCJ-JCF. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Richard W. Story on 12/12/2023. (rsg)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Caterpillar Inc.. (ddm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with Jury Demand, filed by Kurt Phillip. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13089044) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ddm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phillip v. Caterpillar Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kurt Phillip | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Billips |
| Represented By: | Victoria Williamson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caterpillar Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
