Securities and Exchange Commission v. Heart Tronics, Inc. et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Heart Tronics, Inc, Mitchell Jay Stein, J. Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Ryan Allan Rauch, Willie James Gault, Mark Crosby Nevdahl and Heart Tronics, Inc. |
3:2016mi00001 |
May 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Newnan Office |
Spalding |
Unassigned |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1963 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Abstract of Judgment Issued in the amount of $78,000.00 plus post judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961 for civil penalties. Original and Certified Copies returned to Attorney Michael J. Roessner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (jlm) |
Filing 2 Praecipe for Abstract of Judgment by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Abstract of Judgment Notice as to Civil Penalties)(jlm) |
Filing 1 CERTIFICATION of Judgment received from Central District of California, Civil Action Number 8:11-cv-01962-JVS-AN. Judgment in the amount of $128,570.58 plus prejudgment interest for disgorgement and $78,000.00 plus post judgment interest for civil penalties in favor of plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission and against defendant Willie J. Gault. (Attachments: #1 Judgment from USDC, CDCa) (jlm). |
Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (jlm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.