Williams et al v. Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., Inc. et al
Rhudenia Williams and Wiley Williams, Jr. |
Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., Inc., McKesson Corporation, et al, IPR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP |
3:2018cv00082 |
July 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Fayette |
Timothy C Batten |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE by Rhudenia Williams, Wiley Williams, Jr (Hooper, Dylan) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co., Inc., IPR Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation, et al. (Main Document: Summons AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Attachments: #1 Summons Bristol-Meyers, #2 Summons IPR Pharmaceuticals, #3 Summons McKesson Corp.)(jlm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8034793) filed by Wiley Williams, Jr., Rhudenia Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jlm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.