Johnson v. Corelogic, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Johnson
Defendant: Corelogic Services, LLC and Corelogic, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00009
Filed: January 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Referring Judge: Russell G Vineyard
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction with Brief In Support by Corelogic Services, LLC, Corelogic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Danielle Ghazaleh, #3 Exhibit A)(King, Alexander)
February 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Corelogic Services, LLC and Corelogic, Inc.'s Answer due by 3/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 02/13/2019. (usw)
February 13, 2019 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Corelogic Services, LLC, Corelogic, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate CoreLogic Information Resources, LLC for Corelogic Services, LLC. (King, Alexander)
February 13, 2019 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Corelogic Services, LLC, Corelogic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(King, Alexander)
February 13, 2019 Clerks Notation re #6 Certificate of Interested Persons: reviewed and approved by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. (se)
February 12, 2019 Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Ronald Johnson. Corelogic Services, LLC served on 1/25/2019, answer due 2/15/2019. (Smith, Ian)
January 23, 2019 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Corelogic Services, LLC. (usw)
January 23, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Corelogic, Inc. (usw)
January 22, 2019 Filing 1 3:19-CV-00009-TCB-RGV 15:1681 480 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8399769) filed by Ronald Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(usw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 1/24/2019 (usw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Corelogic, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Johnson
Represented By: Ian Edward Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corelogic Services, LLC
Represented By: Alexander Scott King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corelogic, Inc.
Represented By: Alexander Scott King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?