Evanston Insurance Company v. DCM Contracting, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant: Turning Point Church, Inc., DCM Contracting, Inc. and Chris Martin
Case Number: 3:2019cv00019
Filed: February 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2019 Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed filed by Evanston Insurance Company. Turning Point Church, Inc. served on 4/1/2019, answer due 5/28/2019. (Friedman, Seth)
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Turning Point Church, Inc. Answer due 5/28/2019. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 4/3/19. (rsh)
April 3, 2019 Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Friedman, Seth)
March 28, 2019 Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed filed by Evanston Insurance Company. DCM Contracting, Inc. served on 3/20/2019; Chris Martin served on 3/20/2019. (Friedman, Seth)
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to DCM Contracting, Inc. (usw)
February 27, 2019 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Chris Martin. (usw)
February 27, 2019 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Turning Point Church, Inc. (usw)
February 27, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $400, receipt number 113E-8478532) filed by Evanston Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Underlying Lawsuit, #2 Exhibit B - 2016-2017 Policy, #3 Exhibit C - 2017-2018 Policy, #4 Exhibit D - 2018-2019 Policy, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(usw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evanston Insurance Company v. DCM Contracting, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Turning Point Church, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DCM Contracting, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evanston Insurance Company
Represented By: Christopher Cody Meeks
Represented By: Victoria Elizabeth Munian
Represented By: Seth M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?