Andrews v. Freudenberg Nok General Partnership
| Phillip Andrews |
| Freudenberg Nok General Partnership |
| 3:2020cv00225 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement (Joint) by Freudenberg Nok General Partnership (Hoffman, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Del Rio on behalf of Phillip Andrews (Del Rio, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8
TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (dgs) (ADI)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER. Freudenberg NOK General Partnership will have through, and including, February 8, 2021, to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 1/25/21. (rsh)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Asher Hoffman on behalf of Freudenberg Nok General Partnership (Hoffman, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Gavin Stone Appleby on behalf of Freudenberg Nok General Partnership (Appleby, Gavin) |
| Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, First Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Freudenberg Nok General Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order for First Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Appleby, Gavin) |
|
Filing 3
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/8/2020. (dmb)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Freudenberg Nok General Partnership. (dmb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10505736) filed by Phillip Andrews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrews v. Freudenberg Nok General Partnership | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phillip Andrews | |
| Represented By: | Adeash Amarnauth Lakraj |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Del Rio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Freudenberg Nok General Partnership | |
| Represented By: | Gavin Stone Appleby |
| Represented By: | Eric Asher Hoffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
