Howard v. Cook Incorporated et al
Aisha Howard |
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and Cook Medical Incorporated |
3:2021cv00002 |
January 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
New Civil Action Number in USDC SDIN 1:21-cv-6330 (aar) |
Case electronically transferred to District of SDIN. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet sent. (rsh) |
Filing 3 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CTO-122 to SDIN from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for inclusion in MDL 2570. (rsh) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rsh) |
Filing 2 NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/8/20. (rsh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10568653) filed by Aisha Howard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.