Peach County, Georgia et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
Plaintiff: City of Woodbury, Georgia and Peach County, Georgia
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States and McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00043
Filed: March 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion to Stay and Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. must respond to the complaint 30 days after the JPML rules on McKinsey's 1407 Motion. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 4/30/2021. (dmb)
April 30, 2021 Clerks Notation re #15 Certificate of Interested Persons. Reviewed and approved by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. (usw)
April 29, 2021 Filing 15 Certificate of Interested Persons by McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.. (Leeth, Alan)
April 29, 2021 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Amended Complaint, by McKinsey & Company Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Leeth, Alan)
April 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Jeff Friedman, Matt Conn, Andrew Conn, and Stephen Lowry as interim class counsel for the putative class of Georgia Counties and Cities pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g)(3). Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 4/28/2021. (dmb)
April 28, 2021 MINUTE ORDER granting #10 and #11 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Entered by CRD at the direction of Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(usw)
April 27, 2021 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #10 APPLICATION for Admission of Jeff Friedman Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Jeffrey E. Friedman added appearing on behalf of City of Woodbury, Georgia, Peach County, Georgia (cdg)
April 27, 2021 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #11 APPLICATION for Admission of Matt Conn Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Matt Conn added appearing on behalf of City of Woodbury, Georgia, Peach County, Georgia (cdg)
April 26, 2021 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Appoint Counsel Jeff Friedman, Matt Conn and Andy Conn by Peach County, Georgia. (Conn, Andrew)
April 22, 2021 Filing 11 APPLICATION for Admission of Matt Conn Pro Hac Vice.by Peach County, Georgia. (Conn, Andrew) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
April 22, 2021 Filing 10 APPLICATION for Admission of Jeff Friedman Pro Hac Vice.by Peach County, Georgia. (Conn, Andrew) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
April 22, 2021 RETURN of #9 APPLICATION for Admission of Matthew Conn Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10917800). to attorney for correction re: Form (cdg)
April 22, 2021 RETURN of #8 APPLICATION for Admission of Jeff Friedman Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10917763). to attorney for correction re: form. (cdg)
April 21, 2021 Filing 9 APPLICATION for Admission of Matthew Conn Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10917800).by Peach County, Georgia. (Conn, Andrew) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
April 21, 2021 Filing 8 APPLICATION for Admission of Jeff Friedman Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10917763).by Peach County, Georgia. (Conn, Andrew) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
April 21, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Joseph Conn on behalf of Peach County, Georgia (Conn, Andrew)
March 29, 2021 Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Peach County, Georgia, City of Woodbury, Georgia.(Conn, Andrew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/9/2021. (dmb)
March 23, 2021 Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to McKinsey & Company Inc.. (dmb)
March 23, 2021 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.. (dmb)
March 23, 2021 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States. (dmb)
March 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10844623) filed by Peach County, Georgia, City of Woodbury, Georgia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dmb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peach County, Georgia et al v. McKinsey & Company Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Woodbury, Georgia
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Conn
Represented By: Matt Conn
Represented By: Jeffrey E. Friedman
Represented By: Stephen G. Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peach County, Georgia
Represented By: Andrew Joseph Conn
Represented By: Matt Conn
Represented By: Jeffrey E. Friedman
Represented By: Stephen G. Lowry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKinsey & Company Inc.
Represented By: Alan D. Leeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States
Represented By: Alan D. Leeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C.
Represented By: Alan D. Leeth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?