Walsh v. 811 Autoworks, LLC et al
| Martin J. Walsh |
| 811 Autoworks, LLC doing business as A Ok Walker Autoworks and Miles Walker |
| 3:2021cv00220 |
| December 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Miles Walker Answer due 5/19/2022. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 02/18/2022. (jkb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Miles Walker. (jkb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Miles Walker re #5 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jkb) |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Martin J. Walsh. All Defendants. (Murphy, Kristin) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to 811 Autoworks, LLC, and Miles Walker. (Attachments: #1 Summons Miles Walker)(jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Appendix, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
