Glenn v. Butler et al
| Constance Glenn |
| Commissioner Mark Butler, Georgia Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance and Pandemic Unemployment Insurance |
| 3:2022cv00166 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action, Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00166-TCB, and CONSOLIDATE it with Civil Action No. 3:22-cv-00165-TCB. This matter concerns the same subject of litigation as the previously filed civil action, the Court finds that it would avoid unnecessary costs or delay to consolidate these two actions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(3). Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 10/06/2022. (rsg)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Constance Glenn re #2 Order. (rsg) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (rsg) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Constance Glenn. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(jkb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
