Walsh et al v. La Hacienda #3, Inc.
Plaintiff: Martin J. Walsh and United States Department of Labor
Defendant: La Hacienda #3, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022mi00002
Filed: November 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Referring Judge: Russell G Vineyard
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2022 Make all future filings in 3:22-cv-197-TCB-RGV. Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (adg)
December 26, 2022 Filing 6 RESPONSE re #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by La Hacienda #3, Inc.. (Gresham, Jarvarus)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena re: #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum . The time for respondent to respond to petitioner's petition to enforce administrative subpoena, #1 , is extended to 12/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 12/13/2022. (jkb)
December 9, 2022 Filing 4 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena re: #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum by La Hacienda #3, Inc.. (Gresham, Jarvarus)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena re: #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum . Time is extended to 12/9/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 11/28/2022. (dmb)
November 25, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena re: #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum by La Hacienda #3, Inc.. (Gresham, Jarvarus)
November 23, 2022 Submission of #1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (dmb)
November 4, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum by United States Department of Labor, Martin J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(dmb)
November 4, 2022 Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard added. (dmb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walsh et al v. La Hacienda #3, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin J. Walsh
Represented By: Lydia Jones Chastain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States Department of Labor
Represented By: Lydia Jones Chastain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: La Hacienda #3, Inc.
Represented By: Mitchell Robinson
Represented By: Jarvarus Gresham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?