Carlson v. The Newnan Times Herald, Inc. et al
Susan Carlisle Carlson |
The Newnan Times Herald, Inc., Elizabeth Neely and William Thomasson |
3:2023cv00163 |
August 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Susan Carlisle Carlson. William Thomasson waiver mailed on 8/25/2023, answer due 10/24/2023. (Pridgen, Nancy) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Susan Carlisle Carlson. Elizabeth Neely waiver mailed on 8/25/2023, answer due 10/24/2023. (Pridgen, Nancy) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Susan Carlisle Carlson. The Newnan Times Herald, Inc. waiver mailed on 8/25/2023, answer due 10/24/2023. (Pridgen, Nancy) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to William Thomasson. (jkb) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Elizabeth Neely. (jkb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to The Newnan Times Herald, Inc. (jkb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Susan Carlisle Carlson. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12817853) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.