Nikolich et al v. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.
| Michael Nikolich and Aaron Sponaugle |
| Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. doing business as Southern Protection Agency |
| 3:2024cv00006 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Timothy C Batten |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. Answer due 4/12/2024. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 3/11/2024. (dmb)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mueller, Eric) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. Answer due 3/11/2024. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 2/23/2024. (dmb)
|
| Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Plead, or Otherwise Respond by Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion to Extend Time)(Zavoli, Lucas) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. Answer due 2/26/2024. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 2/12/2024. (dmb)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mueller, Eric) |
| Filing 10 Return of Service Executed by Aaron Sponaugle, Michael Nikolich. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. served on 2/1/2024, answer due 2/22/2024. (Bohrer, Philip) |
| Filing 9 Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): 2/15/24-2/22/24, 3/17/24-3/23/24, 4/24/24-5/1/24, 6/20/24-6/25/24, by Jermaine A. Walker. (Walker, Jermaine) |
| Filing 8 Return of Service Executed by Aaron Sponaugle, Michael Nikolich. Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Walker, Jermaine) |
| MINUTE ORDER granting #7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Entered by CRD at the direction of Chief U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(usw) |
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #7 APPLICATION for Admission of Philip Bohrer Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13165655). Attorney Philip Bohrer added appearing on behalf of Michael Nikolich, Aaron Sponaugle. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (esr) |
| MINUTE ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. Entered by CRD at the direction of Chief U.S. District Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(usw) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Admission of Philip Bohrer Pro Hac Vice.by Michael Nikolich, Aaron Sponaugle. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Scott E. Brady Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13165751). Attorney Scott E. Brady added appearing on behalf of Michael Nikolich, Aaron Sponaugle. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (esr) |
| RETURN of #5 APPLICATION for Admission of Philip Bohrer Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13165655) to attorney for correction. Reason for Return: Applicant must include an attachment listing all parties whom they are representing. (esr) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Scott E. Brady Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13165751).by Michael Nikolich, Aaron Sponaugle. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Admission of Philip Bohrer Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13165655).by Michael Nikolich, Aaron Sponaugle. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Philip Bohrer. Clerk to follow-up by 1/29/2024. (djs) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Scott E. Brady. Clerk to follow-up by 1/29/2024. (djs) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Brown Security & Leo Management, Inc. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Aaron Sponaugle, Michael Nikolich. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13163380) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 1/18/2024 (jkb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
